The Guildford Four were charged with direct involvement with the IRA attacks. They were:
- Paul Michael Hill, aged 21 at the time of the trial, convicted of the Guildford pup bombings.
- Gerard "Gerry" Conlon, 21, convicted of the Guildford bombings.
- Patrick "Paddy" Armstrong, convicted of the one Woolwich and two Guildford bombings.
- Carole Richardson, 18, covicted of the Guildford bombings.
5/10-1974
A bombe exploded at the Guildford pub in England which the IRA had planted because it used to be british soldiers there. Five people were killed and sixtyfive were hurt. Around this time the situation in the British society was tense. The parlament adopted an antiterrorist law where the suspects could be kept in jail for seven days without being charged. The police were under huge pressure and short time after was Gerry Conlon and Paul Hill from Belfast, Northern Ireland, arrested and accused for the bombing. Two friends of them, Paddy Armstrong and Carole Richardson, which they had lived with in an occupied house, was arrested for participating. The four of them refused they had anything to do with it but it didn't take long until the police presented written confessions from all of them. Under the trial in 1976 they all claimed the evidence had been fixed on and that they were innocent. The court didnt believe them and gave all of them a lifetime in jail. At the same time, Gerry's father, Guiseppe Conlon, an aunt and some other relatives were accused for helping the terrorists and they gave all of them long time in jail.
In 1989 the case came up again, and the 19th of October the same year they were released and their case was dismissed. Under this trial it came up that a homelessperson could give Gerry Conlon an alibi for not being close to the bombing. This man, Charlie Burke was interrigated by the police, but the police kept this information from the court. The case could also have been taken up again in 1977, when a group of IRA-people confessed to the bombing at the Guildford pub. In the mean while the innocent people sat fifteen years in prison and Gerry's dad, Guiseppe Conlon died.
The four of them later got componsation, but there is no excuse from the responsible ones.
The movie "In The Name Of The Father", tells us what really happened seen through Gerry Conlon's eyes. But the director of the film, Jim Sheridan, took the freedom to do some changes like, that the father and the son shared the same celle, which in real life they didn't. Or that Gerry Conlon and Paul Hill were not in the park at the same time, or that the decisive proof with the homeless guy wasn't found like the movie shows. And the last trial didn't go like the movie showed us it did. But either wat, the movie has the same story and the same message. The most important thing is that the movie was about a miscarriage of justice. "In The Name Of The Father" tells us about british policeofficers torturing and manipulating to get confessions. About a system that follows up on lies and commit miscarriage of justice, and what coincidences that made the four of them free men after being judged for a lifetime in prison.
This was one of the strongest movies I have ever seen. I have to say it was awful and to see how everybody can be wrong is scary. Because they could actually been doomed to hanging, and it is a miracle that didn't happen. I will definetly recomand this movie to everybody that is interrested in something else than horror and comedy. This film brings out a true and awful story which has a good ending.
The trailer of the movie:

Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar